Blog

  • The Coward’s Price For Sobriety

    Six months.  31.5 times six.   93 days?   I’m not particularly mathematically adept at this time.

    Nevertheless and irregardless– off the wagon.

    First, it was the party for a friend of my lover.   Strong through an hour, maybe two.  Then anxious.  Then was asked to get a drink for her.   Hers were weak.  I nod and smile.  To the bar.  Drop a twenty.   “Double vodka.”

    It was downhill from there.  Down into “Proud Mary in the style of Ike and Tina Turner” at some dive called “Longneckers”.  Down to a $100 cab ride two turns north and west because, apparently, I slurred “Spring St” into “Springville”.  At least I didn’t drive.

    But the next morning, with the special lady’s car an hour’s traffic south in Depew?  The shower handle breaks off.  I’m driving down Transit (the reverse route the cab driver should have taken) in oppressive Sunday morning heat, wondering if the {jury,jerry}-rigged hose was still attached to the drain, or if my apartment was (once again) flooded.

    We made it back.  It was a good day in the end.   I topped off the proverbial, but it was good.  In my philosophy of sobriety, a stumble doesn’t necessarily cripple.

    A rough week later, after kilobytes of text too tawdry to re-late, the lover and I were back on terms of endearment.  We just wanted to *be* together.  We did.

    I picked up a four-pack of Ommegang Rare Vos before “we did”.

    I could barely finish the first.   Half of the second, the rest down the drain.   It’s a pathetic ABV, anyway.

    Next week, things are much worse.   I “dialed” a number with three digits.  Wasn’t pretty.  Swore I’d never do that to someone, but I did.

    Gotta swear off swearing.

    375mL of … New Amsterdam?   I walked for it.  To “Liquor Store” on Main in Williamsville.  Very somber in the shop.  I always play a role.  This was the role of the reluctant reprise of an alcoholic.  (No, not *that* disease-implicative term, but let’s use the word for expedience before I lose interest in this post.)  Took it home.  Maybe three shots in three separate talls of Sodastream tonics.  Just enough for a buzz, and the remainder went down the drain.

    Last night.

    Another 375.  Sobieski.  My old friend.

    Downed half that one.

    It was enough to conjure the breath of the dragon.  It was enough to steer me off and leave me waking to a head full of webs and wisps.  It was enough to make me regret.

    And?   Tonight.

    Six-pack of Commodore Perry.  I’m experimenting, see?  I’m working out what quantity might bring the quality that keeps me from coming home every goddamned night and going straight to bed.  I’m figuring what might be enough to erase the mistakes I’ve forced out of recall’s range and be content with myself for an evening.

    To the credit of the experiment, I have spilt some admirable word combinations this night.

    But.

    But … is it worth it?

    I can’t be a drunk again.  Not a “modern drunkard”.  Not an “alcoholic”.  Not … not what I said I wouldn’t be.

    Am I weak?  Am I paralyzed with a fear of being alone with my self?

    Maybe every chance ticked itself off the availables on Memorial Day in 2011.   Can I only choose one role?  If I fail at it, am I doomed to spiral, grasping, down into nothing?

    What was I before this?

    Will I ever be him again?

    Do I want to be?

    Fuck it.

    TUSK.

     

  • Head to Toe

    Blue Angel. 1930. Before most of our parents were born.  In Europe, lusty lust was not lost, but America diluted its fire water into warm milk.  I’m gonna try to capture the spirit of Frederick Hollander’s lyrics made famous by Marlene Dietrich.  Apologies to the dead for this poor man’s rendering of “Falling In Love Again”.

    Some side-wise beauty flickers,
    Some “je ne sais-pas-quoi”.
    Like fool’s gold, a glimmer,
    but the shine is faint and dull.

    And then my eyes catch yours,
    and then we’re face-to-face,
    and now we’re falling forward,
    down into wordless space.

    Always, from head to toe,
    I’m aching for your touch.
    Beyond the dream of us,
    there is nothing.

    All things we are we’ve made–
    together all there is.
    All that’s hers is his,
    and I’m helpless.

    Others flit ’round me,
    like moths drawn to the flame,
    and they will all burn soon,
    but you’ll always remain.

    Always, from head to toe,
    I’m aching for your touch.
    Beyond the dream of us,
    there is nothing.

    Trembling beneath my hands,
    with urgent burning want,
    I’m haunted by the terror,
    that you’ll be going away.

    Not one precious drop of you,
    would I dare to waste.
    I starve for just a taste,
    and I love it.

    I am from head to toe,
    so aching for your touch.
    Beyond the dream of us,
    there is nothing.

    All things we are we’ve made–
    together all there is.
    All that’s hers is his,
    and I’m helpless.

    Others flit ’round me,
    like moths drawn to the flame,
    and they will all burn soon,
    but you’ll always remain.

    I am from head to toe,
    so aching for your touch.
    Beyond the dream of us,
    there is nothing.

    I’ll be updating the lyrics sporadically, as the whim strikes me.  It seems each time I do, I wander further from the proper meter.  Do add your thoughts in the comments.

  • Why 80 characters?

    Searching for reasonable values for the *.vt100.geometry[5-6] xterm menu font-menu options in my ~/.Xdefaults file, I re-stumbled a gem of computing history as the top-answer to a question on StackOverflow, and this pretty picture of an old IBM punch-card.

    Inspired by a perl script within the comments, I ran this shell pipe:

    2015-07-23 10:30:00 :: ~
     rons@rons-VM$ find /usr/share/terminfo/ -type f -printf '%f\n' |
       xargs -n1 infocmp | egrep -o 'cols#[0-9]+, *lines#[0-9]+' |
       sort | uniq -c | sort -nr | head
     489  cols#80,  lines#24
     58   cols#132, lines#24
     55   cols#80,  lines#25
     27   cols#80,  lines#34
     15   cols#80,  lines#40
     15   cols#80,  lines#31
     14   cols#80,  lines#33
     12   cols#126, lines#24
     10   cols#85,  lines#64
     8    cols#80,  lines#42

    Unsure if infocmp normalizes its output such that the cols and lines entries will always be adjoined, but this is good enough for my purposes.

    80×24 wins by a landslide, with 132×24 a distant second.   Then I found a Gnome help page which added 80×43 and 132×43 as options for its gooey{sic} terminal.  Next, a quick stop at the SVGA documentation in the Linux kernel with another list of common geometries.

    Finally, the Wikipedia Text Mode entry which included a neat table of common text modes:

    Text res. Char. size Graphics res. Colors Adapters
    80×25 9×14 720×350 B&W MDA, Hercules
    40×25 8×8 320×200 16 CGA, EGA
    80×25 8×8 640×200 16 CGA, EGA
    80×25 8×14 640×350 16 EGA
    80×43 8×8 640×350 16 EGA
    80×25 9×16 720×400 16 VGA
    80×30 8×16 640×480 16 VGA
    80×50 9×8 720×400 16 VGA
    80×60 16 VESA-compatible SVGA
    132×25 16 VESA-compatible SVGA
    132×43 16 VESA-compatible SVGA
    132×50 16 VESA-compatible SVGA
    132×60 16 VESA-compatible SVGA

    I think I’ll go with 80×50 and 132×60.